Adolis Garcia off IL+
Quote from Jason on March 22, 2025, 3:12 amIs DeGrom off IL?
we need to do a better job of policing this because de grom isn’t on IL anymore so that means this transaction shouldn’t be allowed until both are off IL because this affects the draft.
Is DeGrom off IL?
we need to do a better job of policing this because de grom isn’t on IL anymore so that means this transaction shouldn’t be allowed until both are off IL because this affects the draft.
Quote from Ted on March 22, 2025, 3:14 amno because i haven't made any roster moves since he was on IL+. Only thing i have done is dropped guys and added my own roster/IL guys
no because i haven't made any roster moves since he was on IL+. Only thing i have done is dropped guys and added my own roster/IL guys
Quote from Ted on March 22, 2025, 3:15 amI am allowed to move Garcia off my IL+ to roster while DeGrom or anyone else is still on IL. Just like if they were on my yahoo IL and i dropped someone or moved someone else to NA or IL
I am allowed to move Garcia off my IL+ to roster while DeGrom or anyone else is still on IL. Just like if they were on my yahoo IL and i dropped someone or moved someone else to NA or IL
Quote from Alex on March 22, 2025, 5:58 amI am not advocating for changing this rule this season, irregardless of my team and current moves etc.
However I’ve expressed in the past my consideration for a rule similar to Jason’s above.
I am not advocating for changing this rule this season, irregardless of my team and current moves etc.
However I’ve expressed in the past my consideration for a rule similar to Jason’s above.
Quote from Chris on March 22, 2025, 1:33 pmI don't understand what the issue is here. Garcia, just like deGrom, lost his IL status and Ted simply added Garcia to his roster.
So currently Ted is "over roster". He has at least deGrom on his preseason IL which means he can't pick anyone from FA draft, or sign any FAs or call up any prospects. He could however trade for a player and add the traded player to his team even while over roster.
Yahoo has operated this way ever since Ive been in the league in 2014. If you have a played stashed in IL and the player loses the IL status, Yahoo doesn't force you to open space immediately. Yahoo actually allows that player to stay in IL as long as you want. But the trade off is that Yahoo won't allow you to add any players until space is open. Our preseason IL and IL+ on the spreadsheet operates the exact same way. So Ted is within the rules.
But if anyone isn't a fan of these rules and wants to change them, you can propose changes in August for hockey league and next February for baseball league.
I don't understand what the issue is here. Garcia, just like deGrom, lost his IL status and Ted simply added Garcia to his roster.
So currently Ted is "over roster". He has at least deGrom on his preseason IL which means he can't pick anyone from FA draft, or sign any FAs or call up any prospects. He could however trade for a player and add the traded player to his team even while over roster.
Yahoo has operated this way ever since Ive been in the league in 2014. If you have a played stashed in IL and the player loses the IL status, Yahoo doesn't force you to open space immediately. Yahoo actually allows that player to stay in IL as long as you want. But the trade off is that Yahoo won't allow you to add any players until space is open. Our preseason IL and IL+ on the spreadsheet operates the exact same way. So Ted is within the rules.
But if anyone isn't a fan of these rules and wants to change them, you can propose changes in August for hockey league and next February for baseball league.
Quote from Jason on March 22, 2025, 3:22 pmIf you make a trade In the system, it wouldn’t allow it if you don’t move the IL player off it.
I thought we changed this last year. I was wrong or maybe it was a similar situation, but this needs to change.
it’s gaming extra roster spots during the FA draft and shouldn’t be allowed.
i will propose a rule next year to clarify this because it’s not the correct way to proceed moving forward.
If you make a trade In the system, it wouldn’t allow it if you don’t move the IL player off it.
I thought we changed this last year. I was wrong or maybe it was a similar situation, but this needs to change.
it’s gaming extra roster spots during the FA draft and shouldn’t be allowed.
i will propose a rule next year to clarify this because it’s not the correct way to proceed moving forward.
Quote from Ted on March 22, 2025, 4:35 pmnot seeing the issue here. I haven't made a trade, drafted, signed, or called up a prospect since Adolis and DeGrom were no longer listed day to day. The only thing I've done is cut people. Once someone went NA and i had a space open, i activated them. if you are saying players no longer on the IL can't sit there and must be activated the moment they are eligible then i think that's an unrealistic expectation.
not seeing the issue here. I haven't made a trade, drafted, signed, or called up a prospect since Adolis and DeGrom were no longer listed day to day. The only thing I've done is cut people. Once someone went NA and i had a space open, i activated them. if you are saying players no longer on the IL can't sit there and must be activated the moment they are eligible then i think that's an unrealistic expectation.
Quote from Ted on March 22, 2025, 5:29 pmisn't that currently the situation that i cannot pick or add someone without the space? I have no picks btw so this doesn't pertain to me anyhow
isn't that currently the situation that i cannot pick or add someone without the space? I have no picks btw so this doesn't pertain to me anyhow